Archive for December 20th, 2007

Filed under: , , , , , , ,

When it comes to anything in the financial sector, investors have been watching their stock holdings and waiting for the other shoe to drop. In the case of many companies, these holdings must resemble a financial octopus, as there seems to be third and fourth and fifth shoes dropping, with no end in sight.

That appears to be the case with one of my long-time holdings, MBIA Inc. (NYSE: MBI), which somehow decided this day was the day to come clean. The financial guarantor stated it had $30.61 billion in total multi-sector CDO exposure. MBIA has been a steady performer for 30 years, and this is one of the things that brought it to my attention about four years ago when I added it to several portfolios.

I suppose I should be happy I sold half of it before it tanked. However, this means that what was a wonderful stock pick has nothing to show for itself after four years, at least on paper. I am going to hold on to the remaining shares and ride this storm out, but it is harder to stomach, given management’s bungling.

Now it seems MBIA isn’t only looking like high-risk garbage, having backed a whole lot of questionable securities, but the management seems sluggish (hiding something) in disclosing the company’s exposure to these securities. Once again, something that I originally thought was a conservative investment turned out not to be the case. See: Conservative bankers? Surely you jest!

Recently in a Fortune Inc. interview, Vanguard Group founder John Bogle was asked about investing advice he received early in his career. He replied that someone told him, “Just remember, nobody knows nuttin’.”

To find potential opportunities and verify my track record, read Chasing Value or Serious Money.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm.

Comments No Comments »

Filed under:

Whatever the legal result of Barclays‘ (NYSE: BCS) lawsuit against Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC) over hedge fund losses, the UK bank should have know superior.

The mortgage-related securities bought and held by big financial companies should have been researched thoroughly, but the “due diligence” was thin.

According to Reuters, “Barclays Bank Plc accused Bear Stearns Co Inc on Wednesday of loading one of its hedge funds with about $500 million in troubled assets just weeks before it collapsed with another fund.”

Barclays has a case if Bear Stearns simply dumped risky securities into the fund without any warning. But the UK bank certainly knew the overall asset mix of the pools and was still making a bet that mortgage-related securities would do well.

Did Bear Stearns lie to Barclays? Did it mislead the large bank? Perhaps. But the greed that drove huge banks to invest in these instruments wasn’t limited to Barclays. Neither was the lack of understanding about how the securities worked, or what their risks were.

Barclays can blame itself on those counts.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It